I now will try and speculate a bit about why AMORC makes such a big deal out of defending an argument about the beginning of life that would justify abortion. This had baffled me for awhile- because there is such an emphasis on the life beginning with the “first breath” and the fetus being simply a physiological appendage of the mother, without any soul.

In both The Prisoner of San Jose and in AMORC Unmasked!, I have already tried to show my readers that AMORC, in addition to its powerful use of a program of mind control that deploys multiple techniques for hypnotic induction, there is also a kind of dogma that the cult perpetuates. In fact, if one peruses these blogs, I have probably given this aspect of AMORC a bit more exposure here- than in my books.

Truly, my first understanding of my cult member status was the recognition that I had somehow been exposed to coercive Mind Control, based principally on hypnosis. My books, to a large extent, deal with this phenomena, although they touch on the dogma of AMORC, as well.

Still, the fact is that AMORC uses “the monographs and the home sactum” as a technique for actually inducing trance- without much social contact- principally through the monographs and their obsessive injunctions to deploy hypnotic methods in the name of spirituality- should not deflect the reader from the other aspect of AMORC’S Mind Control: creating, good usable dogma that will come to life in their members and that will further enslave them and bond them to AMORC by becoming vital ingredients in their newly formed, cult personality.

But what is usable about a dogma regarding life beginning after birth with the first breath?